|
MinisodeNetwork (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
thank goodness we all survived.
PhoenixAngel429 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
XDI rememeber watching this when I was 9! XD I remember this all. Y2K, I rememeber that.
MinisodeNetwork (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
were you freaked out at that time too?
Shotblur (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
The problem was that the computers were built to take in dates like 1/1/99 with a year ending in two digits. In this way, the computers assumed that it always begun with 19xx. In the year 2000, computers thought it was 1/1/00. Or 1900. This is the Y2K bug. It won't happen again.
Tsuntin (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Dilbert us not funny...sorry guys.
marilana215 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
mm guess so
MushookieMan (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
yeah, but its like a problem with digit storage so still maybe in the year 10,000 computers wouldn't be able to roll over to 10,000 from 9,999. That's what I was saying.
jjmop3 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
τћіѕ іѕпτ ƒаκє арраяєпτℓч іƒ υ сорч раѕτє τћіѕ τо τєп рєорℓє іп τћє ηєχτ τєп міпυτєѕ чоυ шіℓℓ ћаνє τћє вєѕτ đач оƒ чоυя ℓіƒє τомояяош чоυ шіℓℓ єіτћєя gєτ а κіѕѕ оя вє аѕκєđ оυτ вυτ іƒ чоυ вяєаκ τћіѕ сћаіп υ шіℓℓ ѕєє а ℓіττℓє đєаđ gіяℓ іп чоυя яоом τопіgћτ
marilana215 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
umm..there are the same amount of digits in 1999 (4) as there are in 2000 (also 4). i dont think that was the issue
heythere1012000 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
ha ha ha |
