WKaliber1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

He is like the fascist, foreign agent and backstabber Joe Lieberman

fyi6com (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

It is evident that those who will not stand for liberty are promoted, and kept silent and impotent -- any who would defend liberty and obey their oath of office - be it a military man or a politician. Dr. Martin Luther King rightly called 'silence' a betrayal to freedom. Freedom is not free, and as Thomas Jefferson was quoted - those who desire it must be prepared "to die for" it. So SSNazi Petraeus may be a good man at home and in his private affairs - but not as a servant of the People.

WKaliber1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Petraeus is a good man but a God awful liar whos under Bush's thumb.

Pazrayna (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Is it that hard to just say no?

stevemcgee99 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

He's actually getting a promotion to run the middle east - so it's not too 'big' a question for him. Plus, he's sworn to protect and defend the constitution. Shouldn't he know the answer?IF leadership in the military made political statements, like they did in the Revolutionary War an War of 1812, etc., we would probably not be in Afghanistan or Iraq.

tenbears2421 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

the general doesn't get paid to make these decisions, he just has to try and fix this mistake that has already been made. and if anyone has been in the military you will know that you are not allowed to make political statments that go one way or the other.

hplaserjet2001 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Congressman Paul wanted to get those questions on the record, which he did. He saved the most important question for them to answer, which was did the US have the right to bomb another country without getting approval from congress. The general and the other guy were cowards and chose not to answer. The answer was no the US does not have the right to bomb another country. The war machine is bankrupting the US.

LiquidT3nsion (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

oh please give a break! they are capable of commanding 20 thousand men in Irak and they are not capable of remembering a few questions!? nor even answer a single one?! that for me is ridiculous for someone encharged of such important tasks in the destiny of a whole nation. The last Question was even a matter of a YES or NO. If they don't have the brain to retain for 3 mins some questions and have the balls to say "i don't know, my JOB is Irak", I say Lord have mercy on Iraqi people souls.

XaviersSecretary (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

(reply to LiquidT3nsion)That man(Ron Paul) went on, and on, and on, asking a giant list of questions within three minutes and thirty seconds, not only that, but providing his biased opinion about the topics his questions covered, then leaving the interviewed with a final question. Expecting the two to remember all that he jabbered about, and they didn't even answer them because how could they? Unless they recorded all of his questions he strung out they couldn't have possibly remembered them.

k24bfan (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

This is not spam, I have a link to a blog, which talks about economic, cultural society, and other various American issues. Also the blog has a link to another blog which is also good and from there there is more link. Please read, Iam a strong believer in knowledge is power. Thank you for your time k24b