|
r0sscun (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
As for the dissipation of energy due to friction, there is a solution for it though I am not a fool to relay that information here knowing that there could be others who faces the same problem but unable to solve it and so they resort to ridiculing the idea in order to get the answer but afterwards claim the credit for themselves leaving the one who help them in the dark. Let them criticize the idea, its all that they can do.
r0sscun (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
As far as I can tell there are working models but as to introducing a finish product into the market is something yet to be achieved. The reason why I call for the unity of the inventors is mainly to achieved this very purpose.
jobyweeks (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Id like to buy one now, can you get me in touch with someone who is selling them?
DomusUlixes (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Bullshit. As long as we are not talking about superconductive materials, the induced electromagnetic current will run through material. In order to induce its field. In doing so it dissipates its energy. There is an eminent loss of energy. Without an external power source this won't work. More important, check the video edit at 1:03 (person suddenly appearing top right corner) This is a fake. Because it isn't possible anyhow.
r0sscun (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Contact me if you are interested and I will create a forum for magnet powered motor inventors.
r0sscun (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
By 'free energy,' we refer to energy systems that tap into inexhaustible, ubiquitous, and clean sources of energy generation, such as solar, wind, tide, and geothermal, but also non-conventional avenues such as zero point energy, radiant energy, cold fusion, and magnet motors.
r0sscun (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I'd like to invite all magnet motor inventors to unite and create a forum on yahoo group that we may have shared ideas about this concept and to strengthen the concept itself to create a free energy world. Free energy does not mean perpetual motion.
qwbornqw (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
It works and it is patented. Not just 1 patent but 100s of patents world wide. So can you conclude that this is nuts or breaking the natural law? You don't even look at the variables in your equation. For proof look for international publication number (WO 2006/045333)
TheWiccanBitch (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Why, it's a MIRACLE! Who would have thought that every physicist on the planet, and the very laws of nature themselves, could have been so wrong?!
NoEyeInTeam (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
"The squeaky wheel gets the grease."Cool though. |
