|
jtyranus (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
"but we also shouldn't say a theory is fact because BOTH take FAITH to believe"a common mistake made by the science illiterate, you conflate the laymans usage of theory with scientific theory.do you doubt the theory of gravity, atomic theory, germ theory, or theory of relativity?
whovian1971 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
"merely some retard that doesn't know what the hell the difference between theory and law is "That's a pretty good description of yourself! Theories don't become laws, they DESCRIBE THEM! Your level of scientific literacy is very low.
chaosrunner33 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
i mean lets be obvious when thomas jefferson tried to separate church and state the political attacks drawn upon him by his adversaries saying such things like " if you vote for jefferson the soil of america will be dark with blood" or something similar so we shouldn't backtrack but we also shouldn't say a theory is fact because BOTH take FAITH to believe
chaosrunner33 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
you can say evolution is a fact but until its called THE LAW OF EVOLUTION you cannot say it is fact its called the THEORY OF EVOLUTION not the law of evolution now i however do agree on the seperation of church and state,but saying that its a fact is merely some retard that doesn't know what the hell the difference between theory and law is
Feanorfh (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I didn't thought there are still educated people on the earth that deny evolution, until I found some video about your strange american sect. Even the calcified catholic church accepted evolution.I get really feared of what will happen to the world, if these fanatic christians get even more power in the US policy.Gladly in Germany (or whole europe) there are no such fundamental tendencies. This would be a step back into the middle-age and times of the passed wars...
saxmanchiro (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Evolution is a fact, simply put. To get to 'Theory' level in science, the highest level of understanding of how something happens, is a major accomplishment. So many folks don't understand or realize this process in scientific methodolgy. It is so easy to witness ignorance when they mix this up. I guess they slept through science class in school. EVERY science course starts out with the Scientific Method explained. They need to take a refresher course or just watch some excellent YT vids.
whovian1971 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Id is creationism. It's politically stealthy and vague creationism. Try again!
smburney (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
"The Science is awful." PhD holding scientists use the same methods as secular ones with different presuppositions. False dichotomy argument is incorrect. Most creation scientists seek to give evidence in the affirmative. Look at answersingenesis(dot)org. Theistic evolution is not what most mainstream protestants believe. I am only at 8 minutes in and she has already made a pile of straw men a mile high.
smburney (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
First she lumps ID with all types of Creationism, which is a fallacy. ID is not a subset of Creation Science, it would better be displayed as a Venn Diagram with similarities in between.Then she says that "God created everything in its present form." This is totally not what creationists argue. Creationists do not hold to a lawn diagram of biology, but an orchard, wrong again. Hardly anyone holds to progressive creationism.
whovian1971 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
No, she's isn't spouting claims that aren't true. You're a ranting nut who doesn't know what your talking about! |
