theman4130 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

You make good point, but you never know. As it stands logically your right. I guess it just ticks me off that he dismisses this theory in a smug manner. In the end whatever.

theman4130 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

I think I have heard this blogged here before. I will reinterate, Noam Chomsky is an intellectualist. I'm not defending him by any-means, however I don't waste my time with being upset over him not believing this theory. He can preach whatever he wants to, in the end I(the individual) am going to believe what I want to believe.

marionettehymnal (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

he's effeminate

ChopperSix (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

"Anyone who doesn't agree with me that secret explosives in the buildings blew them up in a hyper-elaborate government ploy is an NWO gatekeeper shill paid by the government and Bilderberg. It's not like I have any evidence BUT THEY JUST ARE!!"Well, that pretty much sums up the entire argument of the Konspiracy Kunts, and lays out every bit of proof they've gathered in seven years.And they wonder why normal people laugh at them ....

bottomdogman (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

chomsky isn't gullible ? I just watched him being interviewed by Ali G. Fa real.

HairLikeCottonCandy (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

All Chomsky said was that just because Bush stood to gain is not proof of conspiracy. He did not comment on whether or not there was any evidence that could link to a conspiracy.

metyzermanfan19 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Yeah because every professor at MIT is an idiot.. That actually makes me laugh. Get a fucking brain dipshit.

mmtot (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Build a straw man and debunk him good one Chromsky!

earthypig (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

my impression of chomsky just went up a notch.

undeadpresident (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

You're all going to hell.